Study guide

Family Law Revision

1 keer bekeken 0 aankoop

Vak
Family Law

Instelling
Birmingham City University

These notes were used as part of my revision for the Family Law elective at University of Birmingham in which a distinction was received. Topics include: Divorce Private law children proceedings Financial orders Public law children proceedings Domestic violence

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 72 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Document laden...

Geupload op 18 juni 2019
Aantal pagina's 72
Geschreven in 2018/2019
Type Study guide

family law

Instelling
Birmingham City University
Studie
law
Vak
Family Law

Volgen

Mexican.or.French.marigold_Pseudochromis.cyanotaenia

Lid sinds 6 jaar 1 documenten verkocht

€10,88

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel v.a. €23,58

Toegevoegd

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na betaling
Zowel online als in PDF
Je zit nergens aan vast

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel (1)

LPC Modules

€ 32,65 € 23,58 3 items

1. Study guide - Business law
2. Study guide - Family law revision
3. Study guide - Property law
Meer zien

DIVORCE LAW AND PROCEDURE
Human Rights
Article 12 ECHR – men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and found a
family according to the national laws governing the exercise of that right

One-Year Rule
S3 MCA 1973 – petition for divorce cannot be brought within first year of marriage
- cannot be waived in any circumstances
Decree of nullity or separation is not affected by this rule

Jurisdiction of the English Courts to hear suits for divorce  S5 Domicile and Matrimonial
Proceedings Act 1973
Jurisdiction where:
a) both parties habitually resident in E+W; or
b) both parties were last habitually resident in E+W, and one still resides there; or
c) respondent habitually resident in E+W; or
d) petitioner habitually resident in E+W and has lived there for min. 1 year before
petition; or
e) petitioner domiciled in E+W and has lived there for min 6 months before petition; or
f) both parties domiciled in E+W; or
g) if none of a)-f) above applied and no court of other EU jurisdiction, either of the
parties is domiciled in E+W on date when proceedings are begun
Also applies to SS Marriages  Marriage (Same Sex Couples)… Regulations + CPs

Habitual Residence
- person can only be habitually resident in one place
- establish ‘centre of interest’ in persons’ life
o Z v Z (Divorce: Jurisdiction): a centre of interest may be established quickly or
slowly, depending on the circumstances. Habitual residence in one country
may not be lost despite a lengthy period in another… There is no requirement
that the centre of interest has to be permanent; it need only be habitual. But
it must have a stable character.

Domicile:
Broadly: if he has his permanent home there
Everyone has one and can only have one operative domicile at any time  may alter:
- Domicile or origin: acquired at birth
o Where parents married: father’s domicile
o Where parents not married: mother’s domicile
- Domicile of choice: every person 16+ may acquire
o Requires: residence in a country other than domicile of origin + intention to
remain there permanently/indefinitely
 i.e. becoming citizen, purchasing home, length of time spent in
country
- Domicile of dependence: cannot acquire DoC if under 16 or not married
o If parents married: follows father’s domicile
o If parents not married: follows mother’s domicile
o If parents separate: follows domicile of parents with whom he stays.

, Choice of forum:
Where choice of jurisdiction + within EU  governed by Brussels IIA
- Commenced the jurisdiction of MS covered by Brussels IIA which first seizes matter = exclusive
jurisdiction
Approac 1. Start with checklist on pg. 24
h a. Domicile: permanent home there (i.e. living abroad but with permanent
intention of moving back)
b. Habitual residence: place of interest
2. Brussels IIa - Article 3 General jurisdiction
1. In matters relating to divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment,
jurisdiction shall lie with the courts of the Member State
(a) in whose territory:
- the spouses are habitually resident, or
- the spouses were last habitually resident, insofar as one of them still resides
there, or
- the respondent is habitually resident, or
- in the event of a joint application, either of the spouses is habitually resident, or
- the applicant is habitually resident if he or she resided there for at least a year
immediately before the application was made, or
- the applicant is habitually resident if he or she resided there for at least six
months immediately before the application was made and is either a national of
the Member State in question or, in the case of the United Kingdom and Ireland,
has his or her "domicile" there;
(b) of the nationality of both spouses or, in the case of the United Kingdom and
Ireland, of the "domicile" of both spouses.

Next 1. Contact lawyer in foreign country
Steps a. How procedure, financial relief assessed, tax implications
2. Once you have advice compare to current jurisdiction
a. i.e. don’t have clean break order in Germany
3. What is best for client?
4. Ask where client wants to go?
a. But client has limited knowledge
b. Take account of costs of flying out
5. ACT QUICKLY
a. Chance that who would have been respondent gets there first, and petitions in
MS which is less preferable (Brussels IIa  whoever seizes it first has juris)

Recognition of foreign decree
- Where recognised: parties free to remarry in E+W
o Court may make financial order
- Where not recognised: will have to petition for divorce through English courts

, Grounds for Divorce
Marriage has broken down irretrievably (S1(1) MCA 1973)  shown through facts:
Adultery and Intolerability  S1(2)(a)
Adultery S1(6): only between persons of opposite sex
Proof: see pg. Adultery = voluntary sexual intercourse between two persons of the opposite sex,
28 one/both of whom are married, but not to each other
Intolerability Doesn’t have to be linked to adultery
Co- Person with whom adultery committed can be made party to divorce – not necessary
Respondent to obtain admission; only evidence that respondent committed adultery required
Effect of Cannot rely on adultery if cohabited with period/periods exceeding 6 months after
cohabitation discovery of adultery (S2(1))
Where not exceeding 6 months  disregard cohabitation (S2(2))
Behaviour  S1(2)(b)
Respondent’s “cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent” = objective test
Behaviour - Petitioner’s word alone ≠ enough
- Have regard to the marriage history + personalities of spouses
Case law see Usually look for 3-6 examples
pg. 29 (unreasonably behaviour can be adultery)
Effect of Where not exceeding 6 months  disregard cohabitation (S2(3))
cohabitation Lived together for 6+ months – not absolute bar but will take into consideration
- The longer the cohabitation, the less likely it will be that court will grant the
petition
- Bradley v Bradley: wife continued to cohabit, but proved that she had
nowhere else to go, had 7 kids, frightened
Desertion (min 2 years) S1(2)(c)
What a) must be a separation  often living apart but can be living together + be separated
constitutes if common home and common life has ceased altogether (Hopes v Hopes)
desertion? b) intention to desert (i.e. bring matrimonial union to end)
c) petitioner must not consent/agree to separation
Pg. 30-31 d) respondent must not have just cause for leaving (i.e. away on business)
e) desertion must be continuous (several periods cannot normally be added together
to form 2-year period)
f) desertion must immediately preceded the presentation of petition (i.e. date when it
is filed)
Effect of In considering whether a period = continuous, no account taken of period/periods
cohabitation not exceeding 6 months in total during which parties cohabited (S 2(5)
2 Years’ Separation + Consent  S1(2)(d)
Separation 2 years’ separation = necessary
Treated as living apart unless living with each other in same household (S2(6))
Pg. 31 - Can be living apart when under same roof (see above)
Physical separation ≠ living apart
- Must have mental element (Santos v Santos – marriage = mere shell, never
intending to live with spouse again)
Consent Must consent
Can be given any time after the service of petition
MUST be in writing (FRP 2010 r7.12(12))
- In practice given by AoS
Respondent my give notice that he does not consent/withdraws consent

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Mexican.or.French.marigold_Pseudochromis.cyanotaenia. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €10,88. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 10 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen

Study guide

Family Law Revision

Document informatie

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Verkoper

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud